Medical Marijuana Advocates to Argue DEA in Federal Court

Jul 31, 2012
By Chris Roberts
From SF Weekly


Must now defend the drug war in court


Is marijuana a medicine, or is it a vitality-sucking, life-destroying devil weed? Cannabis advocates and law enforcement don’t exactly see eye-to-eye on this crucial point — but for the first time, a judge will be called in to decide.

A federal court of appeals in Washington, D.C., late last week agreed to hear oral arguments in a 10-year-old rescheduling petition filed by Americans for Safe Access, a marijuana advocacy group. ASA wants the Drug Enforcement Administration to reclassify marijuana from a Schedule I controlled substance — which means the government deems cannabis highly-addictive, with no medical value — to a classification that reflects its medicinal application.

The court hearing would be the first time the medical merits of cannabis would be examined in a federal courtroom since 1994 — before 17 states and the District of Columbia approved the medical use of marijuana — and a mere 10 years after the petition was filed.

The United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit will hear oral arguments in Americans for Safe Access v. Drug Enforcement Administration on October 16, according to ASA chief counsel Joe Elford.

“This is a rare opportunity for patients to confront politically motivated decision-making with scientific evidence of marijuana’s medical efficacy,” Elford said in a statement issued late Monday. “What’s at stake in this case is nothing less than our country’s scientific integrity.”

Numerous studies, including research conducted by the state-funded Center for Medical Cannabis Research at the University of California, have concluded that marijuana may hold some medical value for sufferers of AIDS, glaucoma, cancer, chronic pain, and a myriad of other diseases and conditions. The federal government has maintained, including at the United States Supreme Court in 2005, that the plant/drug has no medical value.

In recent weeks, yet another study was published, this one directly blasting the feds’ assertions. In The Open Neurology Journal, University of California San Diego researcher Dr. Igor Grant wrote that marijuana’s Schedule I classification is “not tenable.” Saying that the drug — on which the United States government holds a medical patent, and derivatives of which are prescribed in the United States and in the United Kingdom and Canada — is medically worthless and is poppycock, Grant wrote. It is “not accurate that cannabis has no medical value, or that information on safety is lacking.”

The DEA last summer denied to hear an appeal of marijuana’s classification, which was originally filed in 2002. ASA then filed a lawsuit to force the feds into a courtroom.

The results of the hearing come at an auspicious time — it will be about a year from the day the Justice Department began a coordinated crackdown on California’s state-legal, taxpaying medical marijuana dispensaries. About a dozen have shut down in the Bay Area, including eight in San Francisco as of the end of business Tuesday.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.